Final Answer:
Benjamin B. Warfield argued that P and B were two different names for the same person of the Trinity, corresponding to option (B).
Step-by-step explanation:
Benjamin B. Warfield, a prominent theologian, was associated with the concept of "Perichoresis," which refers to the mutual interpenetration or indwelling of the persons of the Trinity. In this context, the option (B) "They were two different names for the same person of the Trinity" aligns with Warfield's perspective.
Warfield's argument aimed to emphasize the unity of the persons of the Trinity while recognizing the distinctiveness of their names. Option (A) suggests a separation that Warfield did not advocate, and option (C) implies a difference in understanding, which does not capture Warfield's nuanced view of the interrelationship within the Trinity.
In theological discussions, precision in understanding the relationships within the Trinity is crucial, and Warfield's position reflects an attempt to reconcile the unity and distinctiveness of the divine persons. Therefore, option (B) best represents Warfield's argument about P and B, capturing the subtleties of his theological perspective. This explanation provides context to Warfield's theological stance and clarifies why option (B) is the most fitting choice based on his teachings and writings.