Final answer:
The term for a written report of a critique's findings shared with a department's members is not universally standardized and can vary. The options of 'Critique Findings Report' or 'Critique Analysis' imply a detailed analysis and could be applicable, but the correct term depends on the specific context or institution. 'None of the above' might also be a correct response.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a student inquires about the name given to the written report of a critique's findings shared with the department's members, they are often referring to a document that encompasses various elements of reporting and analysis of information. Such a document could summarily present the discussion or conclusion of the critique, include recommendations based on findings, and may list references and a bibliography for further consultation.
While the student provided options such as Critique Findings Report, Critique Review, Critique Analysis, and Critique Summary, these terms are common but not specifically standard across all fields. In general academic and professional settings, we can infer that such a document is typically called a report including analysis and recommendations based on the critique's findings. The exact title of the report can vary depending on the institution or the context in which it is being used.
Upon reviewing the options provided by the student and considering the typical content such as a results and/or discussion, it is reasonable to deduce that the most applicable term from the given choices could be 'Critique Findings Report' or 'Critique Analysis', as they imply a comprehensive report with detailed analysis. However, since a universally accepted term for such a document is not provided among the choices, 'None of the above' could also be a correct response if no specified term exists within the context of the department's reporting practices.