Final answer:
The claim regarding MIT's commitment to side-by-side training cannot be confirmed with the given information. Instead, the effectiveness of training programs is measured based on employee response, learning outcomes, behavior changes, and productivity results, as per a 2003 study.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the MIT Commitments include experiences with side-by-side training with qualified trainers and an aligned management team is not directly supported by the provided reference materials, so the statement should be evaluated as potentially inaccurate based on the available information. Instead, the effectiveness of organizational training is highlighted, which refers to how well such training performs. This is measured by four criteria, according to a study by Arthur, Bennett, Edens, and Bell from 2003.The 2003 study analyzed how effective organizational training is by looking at four different types of measurements. These include the immediate response of employees, testing to see if learning outcomes are met after training, behavioral measurements by supervisors, and results like increased productivity and profits. These are important considerations for any training program, including those potentially at MIT. They ensure that the training not only imparts knowledge but also translates into practical improvements in job performance and organizational success.Conclusion To conclude, while the specific claim about MIT training practices cannot be verified with the information given, it is essential to recognize the general principles of effective training programs as outlined by the study, which apply broadly, including to institutions like MIT.