184k views
0 votes
Constitutive non-positivist theories are usually:

A) Empirical and fact-based
B) Grounded in scientific positivism
C) Not focused on the study of power and discourse
D) Grounded in philosophical approaches that challenge positivist claims

User Sasxa
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Non-positivist theories focus on subjectivity and reject purely objective analysis, favoring philosophical approaches over empirical, fact-based positivist claims. They utilize qualitative rather than quantitative methods to deeply understand social phenomena and are not mainly concerned with the study of power and discourse.

Step-by-step explanation:

Constitutive non-positivist theories are generally grounded in philosophical approaches that challenge positivist claims. Unlike positivist theories which are empirical and fact-based, non-positivist theories, such as antipositivism, suggest that social researchers should aim for subjectivity to effectively represent social processes, cultural norms, and societal values. This marks a significant difference between quantitative sociology, which relies on statistical methods, and qualitative sociology, which employs in-depth interviews and content analysis to understand human behavior.

Furthermore, non-positivist theories often incorporate conflict theory, arguing that society is a competition for limited resources, and constructivism, which posits that reality is a cognitive construct by humans.

Methodologies like dramaturgical analysis are indicative of these theories, viewing society as a theatrical performance. Consequently, non-positivist perspectives are not heavily focused on the study of power and discourse, but rather on understanding the social world in a more subjective and in-depth manner, rejecting the notion of purely objective analysis.

User Sadeq Dousti
by
7.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.