Final answer:
Historical attempts to stop Blotter in the house varied by context, including the use of force during the Whiskey Rebellion, blackouts during WWII, landlord intervention for disruptive tenants, and law enforcement in social establishments.
Step-by-step explanation:
To stop Blotter in the house, various historical approaches were taken depending on the context. For instance, during the Whiskey Rebellion, to stop tax enforcement, approximately 500 local militia members converged on the home of General John Neville and demanded he resign his position to halt tax collection efforts. In an extreme measure, they set his house on fire to enforce their demands. In other instances, like during air raids in World War II, Brits instituted blackouts to prevent being targets for bombing, effectively hiding themselves and their activities to maintain safety and morale.
In a different scenario, a landlord, plagued by the nuisance caused by an individual's unusual behavior, had to take immediate actions to remove the disruptive presence from the premises, thus maintaining order and peace in his building. In a similar vein, law enforcement would employ raids and vigilance to stop unlawful activities, as was the case with gay bars where the police tried to catch and arrest individuals for being themselves.
Whether it was during societal conflict, wartime measures, dealing with disturbances, or enforcing laws, the methods to 'stop someone in the house' were dictated by the circumstances and the rules or norms of the times.