Final answer:
The statement reflects Misandry, as it shows contempt for men based on generalized stereotypes, and does not align with the goals of Feminism or Gender equality. The statement includes stereotyping, but Misandry is the primary reflection.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement "I don't want a man around, what use are they except for making half babies?... It's like they are permanently absent-minded... They aren't a patch on women except they're better at fixing cars and playing football." this primarily reflects Misandry. Misandry is the dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men, which appears to be the sentiment expressed in the statement given. It's a clear display of generalizing and evaluating an entire gender negatively, based on a set of stereotypes.
Feminism, in contrast, is a movement aimed at defining, establishing, and achieving political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. The given statement does not align with feminism because it does not advocate for equality but rather denigrates men as a group.
Gender equality is the concept that all human beings, regardless of sex, should have equal rights, responsibilities, and opportunities. The sentiment in the statement does not support gender equality, as it assigns a lesser value to men based on stereotypes. Stereotyping is involved, as the statement assigns characteristics to men that are traditionally associated with men, such as being better at fixing cars and playing football, but it is not the primary reflection of the statement.
This view can have detrimental effects on social relations and perpetuate inequality, contradicting efforts made toward creating a society that values all individuals equally, regardless of their gender.