Final answer:
Revolutionary War soldiers were often promised compensation but many faced financial difficulties post-war, as promise fulfillment was insufficient. The market revolution genuinely brought numerous changes to U.S. society and economy. The statement about Revolutionary War soldiers being well compensated is false, while the market revolution's impact is true. So, the correct option is 1). True.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns the compensation of Revolutionary War soldiers.
It is a common misconception that Revolutionary War soldiers were well-compensated for their service; however, historical records indicate that this belief is false. Many soldiers were promised pensions and land grants as compensation, but these rewards were often delayed or never fully realized. This was due to various factors including the young nation's financial struggles and bureaucratic obstacles. As a result, many veterans found themselves struggling financially after the war, with some eventually receiving depreciated payments or land in the frontier, which posed its own set of challenges.
Another aspect to consider is the market revolution, which was an era of profound social and economic changes in the United States. This movement transformed the U.S. economy from a subsistence-based to a more market-oriented one, leading to the growth of different sectors, increased regional trade, and the establishment of modern infrastructure. This transformation is widely acknowledged as a true occurrence in U.S. history. In considering the provided statements, one can deduce that the compensation of Revolutionary War soldiers is overall regarded as insufficient (Section 8.4.6 - p363, option B), and that the market revolution played a crucial role in shaping the U.S. economy and society (option A).