Final answer:
Wal-Mart responded more effectively to Hurricane Katrina due to its strong logistics, while FEMA struggled with coordination and leadership, revealing the importance of disaster preparedness.
Step-by-step explanation:
Wal-Mart's response to Hurricane Katrina was notably more effective than that of FEMA due to several factors. Unlike FEMA, which faced criticism over coordination, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and leadership issues, Wal-Mart utilized its strong logistical and supply chain management systems to quickly supply goods and services to those in need. This contrast in performance highlighted the strengths of private sector agility and the difficulties faced by federal agencies in managing large-scale disaster responses. Wal-Mart's proactive stance, ability to mobilize resources, and established emergency protocols enabled them to react swiftly, in contrast to FEMA's delayed and disorganized actions. The situation exposed the urgent need for better disaster preparedness and coordination between all levels of government and private sector entities.