Final answer:
Communicating constantly to keep everyone informed can be beneficial in professional settings but can lead to information overload and stress in personal and social contexts. Clear, jargon-free communication within set expectations is vital for success in collaborations. However, balance is needed to avoid the negative side effects of constant technology use and ensure effective communication.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether it is appropriate to "communicate constantly to keep everyone in the loop" depends on the context and the balance between being informed and experiencing information overload. In professional settings, such as long-distance collaborations, communication is key to success, ensuring that all parties understand their roles, expectations, and the nuances of the project at hand. Clear communication without jargon, set expectations for communication methods and frequency, and understanding each party's priorities can contribute to successful collaborative outcomes.
In personal and wider societal contexts, the dynamics change. The media exposure and constant connection through technology can lead to narcotizing dysfunction, making people more aware but less active. It also changes how relationships are managed, with a preference for text messages or instant messaging over traditional phone calls. Moreover, the importance of effective communication is evident when considering historical events, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, where precise communication was paramount to avoid catastrophic misunderstandings.
However, the ubiquity of communication technology does come with drawbacks. It can make it difficult to disconnect from work, reduce the quality of in-person interactions due to divided attention, and create stress and concern about managing an online presence. Hence, the approach to constant communication must be thoughtful and balanced to ensure it is beneficial and does not contribute to stress or information fatigue.