Final answer:
A lawyer may provide temporary legal services in another jurisdiction due to federal jurisdiction in immigration law, as seen in cases like Padilla v. Kentucky. Conditions for such practice vary by the state and may require specific provisions or cooperation with a local attorney.
Step-by-step explanation:
A lawyer may provide temporary legal services in a jurisdiction where that lawyer is not licensed if certain conditions are met. While the options provided do not directly match an explicit rule, the closest answer would be related to practicing immigration law, as federal law may preempt state jurisdiction in certain cases. Thus, when a lawyer practices immigration law, it is often considered to be a federal matter, which may allow for attorneys licensed in one state to represent clients in another state's immigration proceedings.
However, specific rules about when and where a lawyer may provide legal services outside of the state of licensure can vary based on reciprocity agreements between states or temporary practice provisions under certain circumstances, such as working with a local attorney or appearing pro hac vice. Additionally, attorneys have a duty under cases like Padilla v. Kentucky to advise clients on the immigration consequences of criminal convictions, highlighting the importance of understanding both state and federal aspects of law.