Final answer:
Option A correctly states the given sufficient condition relationship: If Israel abandons its settlements, Palestinians will end hostilities. However, the real-life situation is more complex, with a history of mistrust and actions undermining peace complicating the simple cause-and-effect interpretation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding the Conditional Relationship in the Israel-Palestinian Conflict
The question posits that Israel abandoning its settlements is a sufficient condition for the Palestinians to declare an end to hostilities. Option A articulates this relationship correctly: "If Israel abandons its settlements, Palestinians will definitely declare an end to hostilities." This stipulation sets Israel's actions as the precursor to the Palestinian response, indicating that the cessation of Israeli settlement is enough for the Palestinians to cease hostilities but does not necessarily mean it is required for such an end.
Historical context reveals a complex narrative characterized by distrust, failed agreements, and continued actions that undermine peace efforts. Notable examples include the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements and reciprocal acts of violence, which have created a cycle of blame and retaliation. The peace process, as outlined by events leading up to and following the Oslo Accords, entails delicate negotiations influenced by both internal and external political pressures, making the simplification of cause-and-effect responses between the two parties contestable.
Thus, while the theoretical condition is presented as straightforward, the reality is that actions and reactions within the Israel-Palestinian conflict are deeply intertwined with a multitude of historical, political, and social factors that complicate any conditional relationship.