Final answer:
The provided question touches on the logical constructs used to describe the influence of bias in news reporting and the cognitive challenge viewers face in reconciling this with their beliefs. Analyzing media bias requires understanding how conservative, liberal, and moderate news outlets shape viewers' perceptions and contribute to the blending of news and editorial commentary.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed concerns the logical reasoning behind news narration and journalistic bias. The representation using Bill O'Reilly, Chris Matthews, and Rachel Maddow as placeholders in a logical argument illustrates how biases and editorial commentary have woven themselves into modern journalism.
News platforms like MSNBC, Fox News, and CNN come with their inherent biases - liberal, conservative, and moderate, respectively. This mirrors the historical trend where journalists have often integrated their perspectives into reporting.
Moreover, the struggle between personal belief and the reception of new information is an essential part of processing news. As viewers digest different narratives, they need to square new evidence with preexisting beliefs, often leading to cognitive dissonance.
Lastly, the format of news as entertainment further complicates the issue. Programs like Crossfire have been criticized for promoting more heat than light, choosing sensational argument over substantive debate, as highlighted by Jon Stewart's critique.