134k views
2 votes
If Chanel has a rosewood fragrance, then so does Lanvin.

A. Chanel does not have a rosewood fragrance.
B. Lanvin has a rosewood fragrance, but Chanel does not.
C. Other brands have rosewood fragrances, but Chanel and Lanvin do not.
D. Chanel's rosewood fragrance is better than Lanvin's rosewood fragrance.

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The correct answer is B. Lanvin has a rosewood fragrance, but Chanel does not.

Step-by-step explanation:

This question is about logical reasoning. It states that if Chanel has a rosewood fragrance, then so does Lanvin.

This is an example of a conditional statement, where the first part of the statement is called the antecedent and the second part is called the consequent.

In this case, if Chanel has a rosewood fragrance (antecedent), then Lanvin also has a rosewood fragrance (consequent).

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Lanvin has a rosewood fragrance, but Chanel does not.

User Bnussey
by
8.8k points