Final answer:
The doctrine that the agent's knowledge is imputed to the principal is closely related to 'Respondeat superior,' although the provided options do not directly match this description. 'Respondeat superior' is a legal concept that holds an employer liable for the actions of their employees within the scope of their employment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The doctrine mentioned in the question refers to the legal concept that an agent or a subagent's knowledge of facts is legally presumed to be the same as the knowledge of the principal they work for. This principle allows for the attribution of the agent's awareness of certain facts to the principal, even if the principal is not directly aware of those facts. The correct answer from the provided options is not directly mentioned in the question, but based on the description, a related legal concept would be 'Respondeat superior,' which conveys that an employer is responsible for the actions of their employees when those actions are within the scope of employment.
However, the choices provided don't seem to directly correspond with this description, thus it might be a case where the question is missing the correct option or requires more context for an accurate answer. If the intent was to describe the principle that the agent's knowledge is imputed to the principal, then 'Respondeat superior' would be the closest match. Despite this, it is important to note that 'Respondeat superior' is more specifically about liability than shared knowledge.