Question

Major differences between COBIT 4.1 and COBIT 5

Option 1: COBIT 5 introduces a Process Reference Model, while COBIT 4.1 lacks this feature.
Option 2: COBIT 5 focuses more on IT governance, whereas COBIT 4.1 has a broader governance scope.
Option 3: COBIT 5 incorporates a Risk Management Framework, which COBIT 4.1 does not include.
Option 4: COBIT 5 provides a more flexible and customizable approach compared to the more prescriptive COBIT 4.1.

Answer 1

COBIT 4.1 and COBIT 5 are frameworks used for IT governance and management. They differ in terms of the presence of a Process Reference Model, the focus on IT governance, the incorporation of a Risk Management Framework, and the flexibility of the approach.

Step-by-step explanation:

COBIT 4.1 and COBIT 5 are both frameworks used for IT governance and management. However, they differ in several aspects:

1. COBIT 5 introduces a Process Reference Model, which provides a comprehensive and structured approach to managing processes. In contrast, COBIT 4.1 does not include this feature.
2. COBIT 5 has a stronger focus on IT governance, aiming to align IT goals with business objectives. COBIT 4.1, on the other hand, has a broader governance scope that includes overall organizational governance.
3. COBIT 5 incorporates a Risk Management Framework, enabling organizations to identify, assess, and manage IT-related risks. COBIT 4.1 lacks this specific inclusion.
4. COBIT 5 offers a flexible and customizable approach to IT governance, allowing organizations to adapt the framework to their specific needs. In contrast, COBIT 4.1 is more prescriptive and less flexible.