Final answer:
Analogical evidence that compares current situations to previous ones relies on inductive reasoning, a logical thinking process where generalized conclusions are formulated from related observations and data analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Analogical evidence that compares a current situation to a previous one relies on the use of inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking where related observations are used to arrive at a general conclusion. This type of reasoning is often seen in descriptive sciences and involves formulating generalizations inferred from the careful observation and analysis of a large amount of data.
In contrast, deductive reasoning is used in hypothesis-based science where a general principle or law is applied to forecast specific results. Deductive reasoning operates in the opposite direction to inductive reasoning, starting with a general theory to arrive at specific conclusions.