Final answer:
The question involves choosing between the ability to speak and understand every language or to talk to animals. While understanding every language could significantly facilitate human connection and cultural understanding, communicating with animals could provide exceptional insights into the natural world. Both options offer unique opportunities to enhance communication and understanding either among human societies or across species barriers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question presents a hypothetical scenario asking whether the individual would prefer to speak and understand every language or have the ability to talk to animals. If we examine the option to speak and understand every language, we look at the complexity of human communication. Languages can vary greatly, and the difference between a language and a dialect is not always clear-cut, as there is no defined cutoff point (A). The power of language is evident as it's a primary form of expression (B), akin to music in its ability to convey complex emotions and ideas. Understanding every human language would undoubtedly allow for unprecedented human connection and understanding across cultures.
On the other hand, the ability to talk to animals would open up a whole new world of understanding of the natural world. We could learn directly from animals, understanding their behaviors, needs, and possibly gaining insights into the ecology and cognition of different species. This capability goes beyond the general terms used in 'C words for plants and animals' and into a more profound comprehension of our living companions on Earth.
Each ability presents a unique and incredible opportunity, and it's all about personal preference and values when choosing between them. Considering all possible benefits and fascinations could indeed make someone think that having both abilities would be amazing (C).