Question

How does Wiesel’s choice to use this literary device affect the overall meaning of the lines?

A. It tells the reader Wiesel had to keep his stories a secret for fear of what would happen if he shared them.
B. It helps the reader understand that Wiesel could not contain his memories just to himself for he would remain haunted by them.
C. It describes to the reader the negative impact that could happen to the world if Holocaust stories were not shared.
D. It shows the reader that the world has much fury in it, and people need to beware.

Answer 1

B. Wiesel's use of line breaks and word choice such as "dead" and "fossilized" helps the reader understand that he could not contain his memories to himself and that sharing them is essential to prevent being haunted by them. This reflects the inevitability and personal necessity of sharing traumatic memories.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the context of the literary pieces and analysis provided, it appears that Wiesel's use of literary devices, such as line breaks and word choice focused on permanence and death, impact the overall meaning of the lines deeply. These choices serve to evoke the reader's emotions and create a strong connection to the experiences depicted. The specific question posed about how Wiesel's choice affects the meaning of the lines can be guided by understanding these devices' role in conveying the profound and lasting effects of trauma and the importance of sharing stories to prevent isolation.

A.) Wiesel's literary choice doesn't directly suggest he kept stories a secret due to fear. Instead, his use of literary devices intensely connects readers to the psychological impact of his experiences. Therefore, option A seems less likely.

B.) The line breaks and choice of words such as "dead" and "fossilized" indeed help the reader understand that Wiesel felt a profound sense of loss and the haunting nature of traumatic memories, which aligns closely with option B.

C.) While the sharing of Holocaust stories is essential to prevent the negative impact of ignorance on the world, the literary devices themselves are more focused on the personal and internal impact of these memories, making option C less relevant to the specific literary approach taken.

D.) Although Wiesel's words do convey the presence of "fury" in the world, this is not the primary focus of the literary devices used in the provided lines; thus, option D may not be the most accurate interpretation.

Considering these points, the explanation provided in option B reflects the most accurate effect of Wiesel's literary choices on the meaning of the lines, as it directly addresses the inevitability of memories and the personal necessity to share them.