Final answer:
The question of whether poetry on social media is valid as 'real deal poetry' mirrors historical debates about the value of literary work. Figures like Sir Philip Sidney and Octavio Paz argue for the unique craft and experience of poetry, while the digital age challenges traditional views on what constitutes literature.
Step-by-step explanation:
Some people do not believe that poetry which originates on social media platforms is considered real deal poetry. This debate is not new. Historical figures such as Sir Philip Sidney defended the value of poetry during times when its merit was also being questioned, post the invention of the printing press. He believed poetry's purpose was to create new, beautiful worlds, a feat no other profession could match. Today, debates about what constitutes literature continue, especially in light of the digital age, where the mediums of literary expression have expanded vastly.
In considering whether social media poetry is deal poetry, we can reference the works of Sir Philip Sidney or William Wordsworth, who emphasized the craft of poetry. The creation of poetry is seen as a refined art which may start with an emotional outpouring but requires thoughtful revision to achieve its final form. Octavio Paz also noted that poetry creates a unique, inimitable aesthetic experience for the reader.
The challenge in today's digital landscape is distinguishing credible from less credible sources. However, if we accept Sidney’s definition of poetry, we might see that social media can indeed be a tool for genuine literary creation, fitting within the broader definition of literature. Thus, dismissing poetry born on social media as not real deal poetry is a limited view that does not consider the evolving nature of literary expression.