Final answer:
The case of Edward Snowden involves the First and Fifth Amendments, with issues surrounding the freedom of speech and press, and due process rights. The balance between national security and individual liberties is at the heart of the debate.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether Edward Snowden should be prosecuted for leaking government secrets is a matter of legal and ethical debate, not purely a factual question. Two amendments from the Bill of Rights that are particularly relevant in this case are the First Amendment, which protects the freedom of speech and the press, and the Fifth Amendment, which includes protections against self-incrimination and ensures the right to due process. The First Amendment has often been invoked to defend the publication of materials in the public interest, while the Fifth Amendment could be considered in terms of legal proceedings against Snowden or others accused of leaking classified information.
The First Amendment questions whether government employees have the right to disclose information against the interest of national security, and the extent to which the press can report on such disclosures. On the other hand, the Fifth Amendment is relevant when discussing the legality of governmental prosecution and the due process rights of individuals like Snowden.
Regarding the rights and freedoms of citizens and how well the government protects them, as well as areas where rights are at risk of government intrusion, these are complex questions that often require a balance between national security and individual liberties. The US PATRIOT Act and government surveillance have highlighted the tension between these two priorities.