Final answer:
A macro policymaker from the active policy school likely disagrees with the idea that the invisible hand explains equilibrium in all markets, as they support government intervention to correct market imperfections.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks if a macro policymaker who subscribes to the active policy school would accept that the invisible hand notion explains the equilibrium solution in all markets. Essentially, we're examining a view on economic theory related to market regulation.
Those in the active policy school believe in government intervention to correct market failures and achieve desired macroeconomic outcomes. They view active government policies as necessary to steer the economy toward full employment, stable prices, and sustainable growth. On the other hand, the invisible hand idea, attributed to Adam Smith, argues that if individuals pursue their own self-interests, the market will naturally adjust to find an equilibrium without government intervention.
Therefore, a macro policymaker from the active policy school would more likely disagree with the statement. This is because the foundation of their approach is recognizing the limitations of markets and the necessity for government action to correct those limitations. They do not rely solely on market forces to find the optimal equilibrium in all cases.