Final answer:
The morals of 'The Bundle of Sticks' and 'Hofus the Stonecutter' impart lessons on unity and contentment, respectively. While the first story emphasizes the importance of solidarity and collective strength, the latter addresses individual happiness and the perils of ceaseless longing.
Step-by-step explanation:
The moral of The Bundle of Sticks and the moral of Hofus the Stonecutter can be compared and contrasted to illustrate different lessons about unity and contentment. In The Bundle of Sticks, the moral is about the strength of unity. A father demonstrates to his quarreling sons that sticks, when bound together, cannot be broken, but when separated, they easily snap, teaching that there is strength in sticking together and supporting one another.
On the other hand, Hofus the Stonecutter teaches us a lesson about contentment and the dangers of envy. Hofus constantly wishes to be more powerful than he is, and even when his wishes are granted, he realizes that with each new form he takes, there is something else with greater power until he wishes to be himself again. This story suggests that true happiness comes from being content with who we are and what we have, rather than endlessly desiring more.
In contrast, while The Bundle of Sticks stresses the importance of group solidarity and collective efforts, Hofus the Stonecutter focuses on individual contentment and the internal struggle with envy and desire. Both stories highlight important ethical values, but they approach them from different angles—one from the perspective of a group and the other from that of an individual's journey.