207k views
4 votes
What does Hammurabi's law code tell us about the social hierarchy/social classes of the Babylonians? What does the Torah tell us about the social hierarchy/social classes of the Jews? How do they differ? How are they similar?

a) (Hammurabi's Code, law number)
b) (Torah, book—such as Leviticus or Deuteronomy, chapter: verse)
c) Babylonians had a rigid class system; Jews had a more fluid social structure
d) Both societies had a similar social hierarchy with priests at the top.

User Nickrak
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

Hammurabi's law code established a rigid social hierarchy within Babylonian society, with laws and punishments varying greatly depending on one's social class. The Torah presented a less class-divided vision with a focus on community and moral behavior, although it still recognized a form of spiritual hierarchy. While some similarities in hierarchies exist, particularly regarding religious authority, the two sets of laws show very different approaches to justice and social structure.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding the social hierarchies of ancient civilizations like Babylon and the Jewish society as told by the Torah reveals much about their cultures. Hammurabi's law code suggests a rigid social hierarchy within Babylonian society with three main classes: nobles (awelum), commoners (mushkenum), and the enslaved (wardum). These classes dictated how individuals were treated under the law, with different punishments and expectations based on their social status. This differentiated legal treatment demonstrates a structured approach to justice that tried to ensure fairness within each social tier. Similarly, the Torah offers insights into Jewish social structure, indicating a more unified community with less rigid class distinctions, although it does imply a form of spiritual hierarchy with priests holding significant influence.

In Hammurabi's law code, a commoner who injured a noble could expect the noble to reciprocate the injury. In contrast, a noble who injured a commoner would only pay a fine. This difference in consequences highlights the firm social boundaries in Babylonian society and underscores the importance of class in determining legal outcomes. Daily Life and the Family in the Near East confirms that while there were some degrees of fluidity within Babylonian classes, the aristocracy, including priests, scribes, and military leaders, enjoyed privileges and power not available to lower classes.

The Torah, particularly in books such as Leviticus or Deuteronomy, sets forth laws that are not explicitly stratified by social class. Instead, it provides a set of rules meant to govern the behavior of the Jewish people as a whole, reflecting a more equitable vision of society. Though the Torah establishes religious leadership through the priesthood, it does not starkly segregate society into classes in the same way as Hammurabi's code. Instead, it tends to focus on community responsibilities and moral behavior, emphasizing solidarity over class division.

User Keita
by
8.2k points