Final answer:
Supporters of regeneration technology are likely to be medical researchers and patients with degenerative diseases, while ethical philosophers and environmentalists engage with the technology from a position of guardianship and responsible application. Ethical debates center around the socio-economic impact, biodiversity, genetic ownership, and equality of access to such technologies.
Step-by-step explanation:
Who would support the use of regeneration technology? Likely, groups such as medical researchers who look for innovative treatments and patients with degenerative diseases stand to gain the most immediate benefit from advancements in genetic technologies. Ethical philosophers are deeply invested in the implications of this technology and its responsible use. However, environmentalists might be concerned about the impact on biodiversity and natural ecosystems unless the technology is applied in a sustainable and ethical manner.
Pose three questions that require an understanding of genetics regarding the ethical and social issues accompanying the use of medical technology might include:
- What are the long-term societal impacts of genetically editing human beings, and how will it affect genetic diversity and natural evolution?
- How should we manage the ownership of genetic information and the patenting of genetic materials?
- In the context of fairness and accessibility, how do we ensure that gene editing technologies do not exacerbate existing inequalities?