Final answer:
Democracy was best suited to a limited number of citizens and a confined area due to efficient decision-making in a direct democracy. This system allowed for direct citizen engagement in governance. As populations grew, representative democracy emerged as the more practical system. thus, the correct option is B).
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason why a democracy was best suited to a limited number of citizens and a relatively confined area is due to efficient decision-making (Option B). In early democracies, such as those in ancient Greece, the population was small enough to allow for direct participation in political decision-making.
Each citizen had the ability to voice their opinion and vote on matters directly. This form of government, known as a direct democracy, worked well on a small scale but became impractical for larger populations where organizing such direct participation would be unwieldy and logistically challenging.
With the increase in population and complexity of issues, representative democracy became the preferred system. This system allows citizens to elect representatives who then make decisions on their behalf. In representative democracies, elected officials have the resources and time to become informed on a variety of topics and are able to dedicate the necessary time to governance, which the average citizen may lack.
This system also allows for a diversity of opinions to be represented and debated within a legislature before a decision is reached, potentially leading to more considered and comprehensive policy-making.
In summary, a democracy suited to a small population and area allows for more efficient decision-making, as well as direct participation and representation of citizens in the political process. As populations grow and issues become more complex, representative democracy becomes the more practical and effective form of government.