Question

What are the differences between Federalists and Anti-Federalists when it comes to Regulating & Raising Militia, Bill of Rights, and Levying Taxes?

a) Federalists advocated for a strong central government's authority in regulating and raising militia, while Anti-Federalists preferred more state control.
b) Anti-Federalists supported a strong central government's role in regulating and raising militia, unlike Federalists who wanted state control.
c) Both Federalists and Anti-Federalists agreed on the importance of a Bill of Rights to protect individual liberties.
d) Federalists opposed the idea of a Bill of Rights, while Anti-Federalists insisted on its inclusion to safeguard individual freedoms.

Answer 1

The Federalists supported a strong central government in militia regulation, opposed an explicit Bill of Rights as potentially restrictive, and argued for federal tax powers. Anti-Federalists favored state control of militia, insisted on a Bill of Rights to protect freedoms, and were concerned about federal taxing power undermining states.

Step-by-step explanation:

When it comes to regulating and raising militia, the Federalists advocated for a strong central government authority, while the Anti-Federalists preferred state control. Concerning the Bill of Rights, the Federalists believed it was unnecessary and could be dangerous because it might invite violations of rights that weren't explicitly listed, whereas Anti-Federalists saw it as essential to safeguard individual freedoms and prevent government overreach. As for levying taxes, Federalists believed in the central government's power to do so for national stability and economic growth, whereas Anti-Federalists feared that such power could undermine state sovereignty and personal liberties.