Question

Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that you have experienced the art of compromise. How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?

a) A resolution reached through mutual concessions.

b) A complete victory for one side.

c) An avoidance of decision-making.

d) A temporary agreement with no lasting impact.

Answer 1

Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was characterised by mutual concessions, exemplified by the Connecticut Compromise, which balanced the interests of small and large states to retain a federal character within the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

As a lawmaker during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the experience of compromise I would share with my neighbor is that it's a resolution reached through mutual concessions. This means that rather than one side achieving a complete victory, both sides have to give up part of what they want in order to reach an agreement that is acceptable to all. An example of this is the Connecticut Compromise, also known as the Great Compromise, which proposed a bicameral legislature with different methods of representation: the Senate with equal representation for all states and the House of Representatives with proportional representation. This meant that both the smaller and larger states had to relent part of their demands to protect their interests and ultimately retain a federal character in the Constitution.