Final answer:
To analyze sources cited within a podcast, it is vital to summarize its central idea, assess the authority and reliability of the source, compare it with others for consistency, and reflect on its relevancy to the research. Evaluating a source includes verifying the author's credentials, looking for cited information from reliable sources, and fact-checking. Graphic organizers can help systematize this process.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating sources, including those cited in a podcast, it is important to assess their credibility. Firstly, one summarizes the central idea or scope of the source in relation to the research project, then evaluates the source for authority, reliability, validity, and potential bias. Reviewing internally involves comparing the source with other sources to find support or contradiction and conducting a subject search on the author to understand how other experts view their work and how the source fits with the author's other contributions.
Information from credible sources such as academic journals, newspapers, magazines, and reputable websites or TED Talks can be used to build an argument. These sources are generally short but can provide factual support or lead to more detailed sources. In order to annotate, one may use a graphic organizer to summarize and analyze the sources, verifying their unique features, evaluations, and reflections pertinent to one's research.
One must also use critical evaluation skills when approaching any material. Questions regarding the author's credentials, biases, and whether the document represents peer-reviewed research or an individual opinion must be asked. Ensuring that the site publishing the information is produced by a credible entity and includes cited information from reliable sources adds to its credibility. Fact-checking and cross-referencing with other sources or asking librarians can also help in establishing the credibility of a source.