175k views
4 votes
Why was the system of national banks unable to create economic stability?

a. Lack of government support
b. Inadequate regulation
c. Unequal distribution of wealth
d. Excessive government interference

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The national banks were unable to create economic stability mainly due to inadequate regulation, a laissez-faire economic philosophy, and at times, lack of sufficient government support to manage economic issues effectively.

Step-by-step explanation:

The system of national banks was unable to create economic stability for several reasons, but the most fitting reason within the provided options is b. Inadequate regulation. At the turn of the 20th century, there were prominent bank failures that led to losses for depositors and panic on Wall Street. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 attempted to address these issues by creating the Federal Reserve and twelve district banks, allowing for greater regulation and stability. However, the early economic philosophy of the time was one of laissez-faire, suggesting a tradition of minimal governmental intervention. Madison and Jefferson's objections to the national bank in the 1790s, based on a strict interpretation of the Constitution, also reflect the historical hesitance towards a strong central banking authority. Additionally, there was reluctance to increase the money supply by printing more currency, indicating a lack of governmental support for aggressive economic management.

During times of crisis, such as the financial crisis of 2008-2009, the role of bank regulation and the Federal Reserve becomes highly visible, emphasizing the importance of a stable financial system. Without adequate regulation or support, the banking system is susceptible to failures that can threaten not just individual savings, but the entire financial structure.

User David Chan
by
8.6k points