Question

After reading "Jim Crow Policing," complete the following discussion questions in complete sentences. Highlight your responses.

Introduction
• In the introduction, how does Herbert establish the significance of racial profiling?
Body
• Why does the author start with statistics in paragraph 2? How do they start to make the essay’s point?
• What point is Herbert making when he eaks the data down by race?
• Why does the author talk about the reasons New York police stop people? What does that have to do with his main argument?
• What is the main point of this essay? What examples does Herbert cite to make his point?
• What are the consequences of racial profiling?

Answer 1

Herbert's essay "Jim Crow Policing" establishes the significant issue of racial profiling through statistics and systematic analysis. The main point of the essay is the systemic nature of racial profiling and its profound consequences on minority communities. Concrete examples like Heussenstamm's experiment and data cited by Harris (2020) provide evidence for Herbert's arguments.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the introduction of "Jim Crow Policing," Herbert illuminates the significance of racial profiling by discussing how systemic racism impacts the enforcement of law. By citing relevant data and examples, Herbert sets the stage for a comprehensive analysis on the topic. In the body of the text, statistics are introduced in paragraph two to demonstrate the prevalence and magnitude of the issue, providing a factual basis for the essay's argument. The division of data by race further underscores the disparate impact on different racial groups. The author discusses the reasons New York police stop individuals to showcase inconsistencies and biases in profiling practices that support the main argument against such policies.

The main point of this essay is to highlight the systemic issues of racial profiling within police practices and the significant consequences they have on marginalized communities. By referencing Heussenstamm's experiment on the correlation between traffic stops and race-based bumper stickers, along with aggressive and inequitable enforcement tactics cited by David Harris in 2020, Herbert offers concrete details that ground his argument.

Racial profiling leads to heightened mistrust in law enforcement, disproportionate incarceration rates among minorities, and perpetuates racial inequality within the justice system, outlining the severe consequences of such practices. Herbert's discussion aims to promote awareness and provoke thoughtful dialogue on racism in America.