Final answer:
The opposition to Christian schooling for Native American children stems from the aggressive assimilation policies at such institutions, aimed at eradicating Native culture. Leaders like Richard Pratt, who founded the Carlisle Indian School, played a significant role in promoting these policies. Figures like Neolin and Pontiac led resistance efforts, such as Pontiac's Rebellion, against European influence and culture.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns the opposition to the education of Native American children at Christian schools. Such opposition was in response to the broader objective of these institutions, which was to assimilate Native American children into white society by eradicating their culture, language, and religious practices. Notably, Richard Pratt founded the Carlisle Indian Industrial School and was known for his infamous policy to "kill the Indian and save the man," underlying a wider attempt to eradicate Native American culture. The resistance of Native Americans to assimilation and education at Christian schools has historical roots tied to figures like Neolin and Pontiac, who led Pontiac's Rebellion to maintain their cultures and expel Europeans from their lands.
There were clear indications of opposition and resistance to Christian education and the assimilation policies of which they were a part. The practices at these schools were not just about education; they stripped away the Native American identity in a brutal process that included punishment for speaking native languages and forced adoption of Western norms. For centuries, these policies have had lasting impacts, with the Native American culture being eroded and children being subjected to these forced assimilation tactics in boarding schools.