Final answer:
Ben and Phil may display different managerial behaviors, with Ben being more supportive and participative while Phil displays a task-oriented approach and inspirational leadership. Recognizing their styles can aid in fostering a collaborative working relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
Comparing the managerial behaviors of Ben and Phil involves analyzing how they differ in their approach to specific relation behaviors such as supporting, developing, recognizing, as well as their task behaviors, including clarifying, planning, and monitoring. It also pertains to evaluating the extent of their use of participative or inspirational leadership methods.
Ben could exemplify a supportive manager who is great at recognizing individual achievements and fostering a team environment that supports personal and career growth among employees. Meanwhile, Phil might display more task-oriented behaviors, maintaining a focus on clarifying roles, planning tasks, and monitoring team performance to ensure targets are met.
Regarding leadership styles, Ben may lean towards participative leadership, readily including team members in the decision-making process and valuing their contributions. On the other side, Phil could embrace an inspirational leadership style, seeking to motivate and inspire his team through a clear vision and strong drive towards achieving organizational goals. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of each manager can help in cultivating a collaborative working relationship, which is imperative for both job satisfaction and growth opportunities.