Final answer:
An activist would likely react positively to the sports team name change due to its alignment with social justice and cultural sensitivity, which are intrinsic to activism. Students' reactions might range from satisfaction, for the affirmation of their values, to inspiration to advocate for change or improve personally. Speech conveys the emotion and urgency of activism more viscerally than print.
Step-by-step explanation:
The activist interviewed would likely react positively to the news of the name change as it is a significant move towards social justice and cultural sensitivity. This acknowledgment of concerns regarding offensive names by major sports teams reflects the broader efforts to challenge and dismantle systemic inequality and discrimination, which are central to activism. The student's question appears to be part of a wider discussion on social movements and their impacts on society.
The students with 'A' grades before the change might feel satisfied that their excellence is now represented by a team with a socially responsible name. They could be motivated to continue performing well and supporting the team, while also advocating for further positive changes within their communities. Conversely, 'C' and 'F' grade students might see this change as an inspiration to improve and act as proof that transformation and betterment are possible on both personal and societal levels.
When comparing writing for speech versus writing for print, an activist speaking elicits a more immediate and emotional response than printed words. The in-person presence, tone of voice, and body language of an activist can convey urgency and passion, inspiring listeners in ways that print cannot always achieve. Activists, like those within the MeToo movement, often utilize both speech and print to maximize their reach and impact.