Question

The Industrial Revolution was a time of great change for Great Britain, and women benefited the most from these changes. Children were also able to find work in the new factories that sprang up in cities. And though children were often not paid well and forced to work long hours in dangerous conditions, the benefits far outweighed the problems. Poor men also had more opportunities and were able to make more money than before the Industrial Revolution. This new earning power allowed them to better contribute and helped grow the nation's economy.

Which sentence best evaluates the credibility of this historical argument?
A. The historical argument is credible because it makes the correc claim that women benefited from the Industrial Revolution.
B. The historical argument is credible because it includes a strong claim and evidence from a credible source.

Answer 1

The historical argument in the question cannot be fully evaluated because it contains both accurate and inaccurate statements.

Step-by-step explanation:

The historical argument in the question cannot be fully evaluated because it contains both accurate and inaccurate statements. While it is true that women and children did find work in factories during the Industrial Revolution, the claim that women benefited the most is not entirely accurate. Women faced many challenges and inequalities during this time, including low wages and dangerous working conditions. Additionally, the claim that the benefits of the Industrial Revolution outweighed the problems is subjective and depends on individual perspectives. A more balanced evaluation would consider both the positive and negative impacts of the Industrial Revolution on different social groups.