54.5k views
4 votes
Which statement is false about preparing court-admissible photographs?

a. Usually presenting the negative is sufficient proof against allegations of photo alteration.
b. If you include a ruler or other scale in the photograph, you should also take an identical photo without the scale or ruler.
c. Adding a timestamp to the photograph enhances its admissibility.
d. Using consistent lighting conditions in photographs is crucial for legal validity.

User Nikolaus
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

Using consistent lighting conditions in photographs is not crucial for legal validity.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that is false about preparing court-admissible photographs is d. Using consistent lighting conditions in photographs is crucial for legal validity.

While consistent lighting conditions can enhance the quality and clarity of a photograph, they are not a requirement for admissibility in court. Other factors such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability are more important in determining the admissibility of a photograph as evidence.

User Ian Hincks
by
8.1k points