Final answer:
Using consistent lighting conditions in photographs is not crucial for legal validity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is false about preparing court-admissible photographs is d. Using consistent lighting conditions in photographs is crucial for legal validity.
While consistent lighting conditions can enhance the quality and clarity of a photograph, they are not a requirement for admissibility in court. Other factors such as relevance, authenticity, and reliability are more important in determining the admissibility of a photograph as evidence.