Final Answer:
The most fitting choice isIt helps the reader understand that Wiesel could not contain his memories just to himself for he would remain haunted by them.Thus the option B) It helps the reader understand that Wiesel could not contain his memories just to himself for he would remain haunted by them is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Elie Wiesel's use of the literary device in question, likely referring to the choice of narrative perspective, contributes significantly to the understanding of the emotional burden he carries. Option B correctly captures the essence of this choice.
By opting not to keep his memories confined, Wiesel allows readers to grasp the profound impact the Holocaust had on him personally. This choice suggests that the memories are too haunting for him to bear alone, emphasizing the collective nature of the trauma and the importance of shared remembrance.
The use of a literary device, such as the chosen narrative perspective, is a deliberate authorial decision that shapes the overall meaning of a text. In Wiesel's case, sharing his memories through literature is a deliberate act of bearing witness to the atrocities of the Holocaust. Option B aligns with this interpretation, indicating that Wiesel's choice serves as a means to convey the weight of his experiences to the reader and emphasizes the necessity of communal acknowledgment.
Understanding an author's purpose in employing literary devices enhances the interpretation of a text. Wiesel's decision to share his memories through literature is not just a personal catharsis but a deliberate attempt to ensure that the horrors of the Holocaust are not forgotten.
Option B accurately captures this intention, providing a nuanced understanding of the author's motivation and the broader implications of sharing such traumatic narratives.
Thus the option B) It helps the reader understand that Wiesel could not contain his memories just to himself for he would remain haunted by them is correct.