Final answer:
A person’s story is more believable when it is consistent with known facts and contains reliable, factual information. Appeal to logos and the writer's established credibility are crucial for believability, rather than emotional appeal, language vividness, or story length.
Step-by-step explanation:
One person’s story might be considered more believable than another’s due to consistency with known facts. Reliable facts and logical evidence bring a sense of authenticity and trustworthiness to a story, making it more persuasive. Establishing credibility is crucial, and writers can do this by including their credentials, citing reliable sources and presenting factual information. A story that aligns with established facts and contains credible evidence is generally more convincing than one that only appeals to emotions, uses vivid language, or is lengthy.
Appeal to logos is important in making a story believable. Including data and using a rational approach support the writer’s arguments logically. Conversely, relying purely on emotional appeal or the aesthetic quality of the language (vivid language) may not contribute to a story’s credibility as much as well-founded, logical evidence would. Similarly, the length of the story is not typically a factor in determining believability; a short, fact-based story can be more convincing than a long, detailed one lacking in credible evidence.
Consistency with known facts inherently appeals to a reader’s reason, and when paired with a writer’s expertise on the topic, greatly enhances the persuasiveness of the story. While emotional concerns and engaging language can play roles in how a story is received, they are secondary to the factual underpinning of the narrative.