Final answer:
Regarding President George W. Bush, labeling him as a proponent of liberal internationalism is false
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is asking whether the United States strategy of great power competition produces more benefits than harms. This question falls under the subject of Social Studies and is suitable for high school students.
The answer to the question depends on one's perspective and the specific context in which the strategy is being employed. However, it can be argued that the United States strategy of great power competition does produce more benefits than harms. The strategy promotes national security, deters aggression from other countries, and encourages technological advancements and innovation. It also allows the United States to maintain its status as a global power and protect its interests.
One example of a benefit is that great power competition can lead to advancements in technology and military capabilities. For instance, during the Cold War, the competition between the United States and the Soviet Union spurred the development of nuclear technology and space exploration. These advancements had significant impacts on various industries and scientific research.
Regarding President George W. Bush, labeling him as a proponent of liberal internationalism is false. His presidency was marked by a more unilateral approach, especially after the events of September 11, 2001. The market revolution, on the other hand, indeed brought many social and economic changes to the United States, making that statement true. As for the voting rates in the United States compared to other democratic industrialized countries, the statement is false; typically, U.S. voting rates are lower. Finally, both the Americans and the British did not give up claims to the Mississippi for the sake of peace; that statement is also false.