Final answer:
It is true that a need for reform in policing has been recognized from early on, leading to efforts to implement changes. Over time, incidents of police brutality and racial profiling have prompted demands for change and catalyzed reform at various levels of government. Systems like Zero Tolerance Policing have also spurred debate and pushed for continual reassessment of police tactics.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the beginning of policing, there have been calls for reform and better practices within law enforcement. It is true that there was a recognized need to change policing, supported by efforts to implement these changes aggressively. However, the effectiveness and type of policing reforms have varied significantly over time. Police brutality, racially biased law enforcement like racial profiling, and responses to public outcry such as the Rodney King incident and the Ferguson unrest have at times been catalysts for change. Additionally, the adoption of Zero Tolerance Policing in the 1990s, influenced by the Broken Windows Theory, has been controversial and has signaled the need for continual assessment and revision of police tactics. Efforts at reform have included boosting community-oriented policing and deploying technology such as body cameras to reduce police misconduct. The ongoing discussion signals an evolving approach to policing that crescendos in response to social tensions and demands for justice and efficiency within the system.