Final answer:
The inquiry analyses potential presidential stances on immigration policy, focusing on national security, cultural diversity, and economic impact, influenced by historical and current political views, especially within the context of the U.S.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question poses a theoretical scenario where you are to decide on your stance regarding immigration policy if you were running for president. Choices range from stricter requirements for national security, keeping them lax for cultural diversity, basing them on economic impact, or an alternative 'other' option. This topic is heavily debated among politicians and economists, as seen during the 2016 election cycle and the differing approaches of the Trump and Biden administrations. Views on immigration can affect cultural aspects, including language and social patterns, but economists mostly believe that despite some negative impacts on domestic workers, immigration benefits outweigh the costs.
Presidential policies in the U.S. have oscillated between restrictive and more inclusive approaches to immigration. The controversy often involves the balance between security and economic growth, with many economists suggesting that freeing up immigration barriers could potentially increase global economic growth by bringing in more labor and talent, boosting consumption, and fostering innovation. However, cultural assimilation and pluralism are also factors affected by these policies. The question of global economic impact by eliminating all barriers to immigration involves weighing the potential boost in economic activity against the realities of domestic labor markets and social integration challenges.