Final answer:
Answer C is correct because measuring time in seconds results in a more accurate depiction than measuring in just minutes. Seconds offer finer precision and are the preferred unit when high accuracy is necessary.
Step-by-step explanation:
In response to the student's question, the most accurate measurement of time is obtained by using the smallest unit possible. Thus, the correct answer is C. No, measuring time in seconds gives a more accurate answer than in just minutes. This is because seconds are smaller units of time compared to minutes, allowing for a more detailed and precise measurement. When timing events or processes that require a high degree of accuracy, using seconds allows for finer gradations and reduces the potential for rounding errors.
For example, to convert 120 seconds to minutes, you would divide by 60, since there are 60 seconds in a minute, resulting in 2 minutes. This conversion highlights how a larger unit like minutes can mask the precision available with a smaller unit like seconds. When precision and accuracy are fundamental, such as in the measurement of athletic performance or in scientific experiments, seconds are preferred over minutes.