Answer:
Mexico's fight for independence during the 1800s was not necessarily considered a revolution because it was a gradual process that was largely peaceful. It was a combination of a series of uprisings, negotiations, and treaties that ultimately led to Mexico's independence from Spain in 1821. The term "revolution" typically implies a more sudden and dramatic overthrow of a government or system.
Step-by-step explanation:
Mexico's fight for independence during the 1800s would not necessarily be considered a revolution because it was a gradual process that took place over a period of several decades. The movement began in 1810 with the start of the Mexican War of Independence, which was led by Father Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla and other Mexican revolutionaries. The war was fought against the Spanish colonial government, which had ruled Mexico since the 16th century. The war ended in 1821 with the signing of the Treaty of Cordoba, which granted Mexico its independence from Spain.
However, the process of establishing a new government and nation was not complete until 1824, when the Constitution of 1824 was ratified. This document established the Mexican Empire, which was a monarchy ruled by Agustin de Iturbide. This was followed by the establishment of the Republic of Mexico in 1836, which was a federal republic with a president as its head of state.
Therefore, while the Mexican War of Independence was an important part of the struggle for independence, it was only the beginning of a long process of establishing a new government and nation. This process was gradual and did not involve the kind of radical changes that are usually associated with a revolution.