Nadia might argue that Preston's population is growing more rapidly based on the larger increase in population, while Quinn might argue that Elm Ridge's population is growing more rapidly based on the higher percentage increase. Both have logical reasoning, but it depends on the metric used to determine population growth.
Step-by-step explanation:
A. Nadia might argue that Preston's population is growing more rapidly because the increase in population from last year to this year is larger in Preston compared to Elm Ridge. In Preston, the population increased by 113, while in Elm Ridge, it increased by 56. The larger increase in population in Preston indicates a faster rate of growth.
B. Quinn might argue that Elm Ridge's population is growing more rapidly because the percentage increase in population is higher in Elm Ridge compared to Preston. In Elm Ridge, the population increased by about 2.82% (56/1,870), while in Preston, the population increased by about 2.02% (113/5,589). The higher percentage increase suggests a faster rate of growth in Elm Ridge.
C. Both Nadia and Quinn have logical reasoning, but it ultimately depends on which metric is considered more important in determining population growth. If absolute increase is valued more, Nadia's reasoning is more logical. If percentage increase is valued more, Quinn's reasoning is more logical.
The probable question can be: Nadia lives in the town of Preston. Quinn lives in the town of Elm Ridge. Nadia and Quinn each claim that her respective town's population is growing more rapidly.
Preston
Last Year 5,589 and this Year 5,702
ELM Ridge
Last Year 1,870
and this Year 1,926
A. Write an argument to support Nadia. Why might she argue that Preston's population is growing more rapidly? B. Write an argument to support Quinn. Why might she argue that Elm Ridge's population is growing more rapidly? C. Whose reasoning is more logical?