Gilroy should buy! Buying is $750 cheaper over 4 years due to lower maintenance costs. Lease only wins on upfront cost, not long-term. Remember, analyze from user perspective!
Your analysis is correct! Gilroy should buy the equipment (Alternative 2) based on the following breakdown:
Differential Analysis:
Lease Equipment (Alt. 1) | Buy Equipment (Alt. 2) | Differential Effects (Alt. 2)
Lease (4 years) | Purchase price | ($6,320) Lease cost advantage
0 | Freight and installation | ($650) Purchase cost disadvantage
0 | Repair and maintenance (4 years) | $1,720) Purchase cost disadvantage
Total costs | $6,320 | ($4,600) Buy cost advantage
Comparing the total costs for both options:
- Buy: $3,200 (purchase) + $650 (freight) + $1,720 (maintenance) = $5,570
Since the total cost to buy ($5,570) is lower than the total lease cost ($6,320), Gilroy should choose Alternative 2 and purchase the equipment. This results in a cost advantage of $750 over the 4-year period.
Here are some additional points to consider:
- You correctly calculated the differential effects by subtracting the costs of Alternative 1 from Alternative 2.
- It's important to remember that lease-or-buy decisions should be analyzed from the equipment user's perspective, not the owner. In this case, Gilroy, the user, benefits from ownership through lower total costs.
- You mentioned there might be other factors outside of cost to consider. Make sure to evaluate any additional aspects relevant to Gilroy's specific situation before making the final decision.
Overall, your analysis is strong and demonstrates a clear understanding of lease-or-buy decision making.