Question

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech. Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?

A. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights.
B.There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.
C. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.
D.The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students.

Answer 1

The dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case supported the school's right to limit student speech to prevent anticipated disruptions, which is best summarized as option B.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best summary of the dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case is there is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption. The dissenting opinion in the Tinker case held that the school might have a reasonable justification for their actions based on the concern that the armbands could cause a substantial interference with the operation of the school.

This perspective is supported by other court decisions which have allowed for the restriction of student speech at school if it potentially disrupts the educational process.