Question

Read this passage from chapter 5 of The Prince.

There are, for example, the Spartans and the
Romans. The Spartans held Athens and Thebes,
establishing there an oligarchy: nevertheless they lost
them. The Romans, in order to hold Capua, Carthage,
and Numantia, dismantled them, and did not lose
them. They wished to hold Greece as the Spartans
held it, making it free and permitting its laws, and did
not succeed. So to hold it they were compelled to
dismantle many cities in the country, for in truth there
is no safe way to retain them otherwise than by
ruining them. And he who becomes master of a city
accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it, may
expect to be destroyed by it, for in rebellion it has
always the watchword of liberty and its ancient
privileges as a rallying point, which neither time nor
benefits will ever cause it to forget. And whatever you
may do or provide against they never forget that
What is Machiavelli's secondary purpose in writing this
passage?
O to inform readers about the history of Rome and
Sparta and how they built their empires
O to inform readers about the tactics Sparta and
Rome used to hold cities and their effectiveness
O to persuade readers that a conquering prince must
destroy a former republic if he hopes to hold it
O to persuade readers that a republic will remember
freedom and someday rebel against a conqueror

Answer 1

Machiavelli's secondary purpose is to persuade readers of the necessity for a conqueror to destroy a republic to ensure control, utilizing historical instances to argue liberty's enduring influence on a city's resistance. The correct option is O to persuade readers that a conquering prince must destroy a former republic if he hopes to hold it.

Step-by-step explanation:

Machiavelli's secondary purpose in writing the passage from chapter 5 of The Prince is to persuade readers that a conquering prince must destroy a former republic if he hopes to hold it. By examining historical examples like the Spartans' failure to retain control of Athens and Thebes, compared to the Romans' successful dismantling of Capua, Carthage, and Numantia, Machiavelli argues that cities accustomed to freedom pose a persistent threat unless completely brought to ruin.

These insights are part of Machiavelli's broader discussion on power, control, and political strategy, emphasizing that liberty and ancient privileges are powerful motifs that conquered republics will continually seek to reclaim.