111k views
1 vote
Had not been invented yet is complete subject or fragments?​

User Jenissa
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The phrase 'had not been invented yet' is a fragment, not a complete subject. Fragments lack essential components like a main subject and verb. To correct a fragment, it can be attached to a complete sentence or rewritten to include the necessary elements.

Step-by-step explanation:

The phrase 'had not been invented yet' is not a complete subject; it is a fragment. In English, a complete subject must have a main noun (or pronoun) along with all of its modifiers. A fragment, on the other hand, is missing essential components that make it a complete sentence. Fragments often occur when they follow a complete sentence and expand on it without forming a complete thought by themselves. To avoid fragments, one can attach the fragment to a complete sentence or rewrite it to include a main subject and a verb. For example:

  • Unintentional Fragment: 'had the official maps of the United States tinkered with.' This lacks a main subject and verb.
  • Complete Sentence: 'My father had the official maps of the United States tinkered with to hide our location.'

In the second example, the phrase becomes part of a complete sentence because it includes a main subject ('My father') and a main verb ('had tinkered with').

Recognizing and correcting sentence fragments is an important part of subject/verb agreement and constructing coherent sentences. As illustrated in section 13.2 of a grammar guide, ensuring the subject and verb agree in number and person is essential for creating correct and understandable sentences.

User Dinidiniz
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.