Question

Two employees violate the same work rule. One is above average in performance and has been with your company for 8 years. The other employee is an average performer who has been with your company for a little over a year. Should these employees receive the same discipline?

Answer 1

Disciplining employees in the workplace should take into consideration their performance and length of service. In this scenario, the above-average performer with 8 years of experience may warrant a milder form of discipline compared to the average performer with 1 year of experience. Tailoring discipline to each employee's individual circumstances helps maintain a fair work environment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Discipline in the Workplace

When it comes to disciplining employees, it is important to consider their performance and length of service. In the given scenario, the employee with above-average performance and 8 years of experience should be treated differently from the average performer with 1 year of experience. While both employees violated the same work rule, their overall performance and tenure indicate that they should receive different levels of discipline.

Discipline in the workplace should be based on a fair and consistent approach. In this case, the above-average employee with 8 years of experience has proven their value to the company over time. This employee may warrant a milder form of discipline, such as a verbal warning or a written warning, depending on the severity of the rule violation.

The average performer with only 1 year of experience may require a more strict disciplinary action, such as a written warning or a temporary suspension, to address the violation and remind them of the company's expectations. By tailoring the discipline to each employee's individual circumstances, it acknowledges their unique contributions and helps maintain a fair and motivating work environment.