Final answer:
The false statement is 'd) For the voluntarily intoxicated, disaffirmance is not allowed even if they did not know they were making the contract.' Intoxicated individuals may have the right to disaffirm a contract on regaining capacity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The false statement among the provided options is 'd) For the voluntarily intoxicated, disaffirmance is not allowed even if they did not know they were making the contract.' In fact, contracts made under the influence of alcohol or drugs that impair judgment can be considered voidable, and the intoxicated person may have the right to disaffirm the contract upon regaining capacity, provided they act promptly and restore the benefits received under the contract.
Regarding the other options:
- Emancipated minors indeed can have restricted rights to disaffirm contracts, which aligns with the nuanced approach the law takes for individuals who are no longer under the care or authority of their parents and thus are granted some adult responsibilities and rights.
- Employees acting outside the scope of their authority typically expose themselves to personal liability, as their actions are beyond the protections normally afforded by their employer's corporate shield.
- In contracts involving minors, generally, the minor is allowed to disaffirm the contract and is entitled to receive back what they have conferred, even if they cannot return all that was received. This aspect of the law is designed to protect minors due to their lack of capacity to enter into contracts.