Question

What do critics say is a flaw in the military self-sufficiency argument for protective tariffs to encourage domestic production of goods needed for national security?

a) National security is more important than economic considerations.
b) Foreign nations will supply military equipment as reliably as U.S. producers.
c) Many industries can claim they make contributions to national security and deserve protection.
d) Many citizens in the United States agree that the products used for national defense should be protected.

Answer 1

Critics argue that many industries can claim they make contributions to national security and deserve protection, weakening the argument for protective tariffs based on military self-sufficiency.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to critics, a flaw in the military self-sufficiency argument for protective tariffs is that many industries can claim they make contributions to national security and deserve protection.

This means that if the argument is accepted, nearly any industry can demand protection, making it difficult to determine which industries are truly critical to national security. For example, industries involved in producing non-essential goods could argue that protecting their products is essential for national security, which weakens the argument for protectionism based on military self-sufficiency.